15.4 Key Theoretical Frameworks and Methodologies
Theoretical Lenses and Analytical Methodologies in Ecolinguistics
Ecolinguistics uses a strong set of theories and methods to investigate how language impacts our environment.
The "Stories We Live By": Uncovering Worldviews through Language
A core concept in ecolinguistics, developed by Arran Stibbe, is the idea of "stories we live by." These are mental models shared within a society that profoundly influence how humans perceive, think about, communicate, and act in relation to ecosystems.
Eco-critical Discourse Analysis (ECDA): Deconstructing Environmental Narratives
Eco-critical Discourse Analysis (ECDA) is a significant methodological pillar of ecolinguistics.
The Power of Metaphor and Framing in Ecological Discourse
Metaphor and framing are fundamental concepts in ecolinguistics that heavily influence environmental discourse.
Metaphors create new understandings and perspectives about the environment.
For example, "climate change as a war" conveys urgency, while "climate change as an economic opportunity" highlights benefits. Framing dictates how environmental information is presented and interpreted.
For instance, representing "nature as a machine" can foster a utilitarian view, while "nature as a living being" cultivates a more nurturing attitude.
The Role of Cognitive Linguistics in Ecolinguistic Analysis
Ecolinguistics integrates theories from cognitive science to understand how humans perceive, categorize, and conceptualize their environment.
Ecolinguistics and Environmental Philosophy (Ecosophy)
Ecolinguistics operates within a normative framework guided by an "ecological philosophy" or "ecosophy." This ecosophy is rooted in a scientific understanding of ecological interdependence and an ethical framework that defines whose survival and flourishing hold moral significance.
A significant influence is Deep Ecology, which argues that the living environment has intrinsic moral and legal rights to exist and thrive, independent of human utility.
The ethical dimension of ecolinguistics sets it apart. It's not just descriptive linguistic analysis; it explicitly evaluates "stories we live by" against an ecosophy informed by environmental philosophies like Deep Ecology, asserting the intrinsic value of all life. The field's objectives are to challenge "destructive stories" and develop "beneficial new stories." This active, prescriptive stance, focusing on advocating for "other-directed social movements" that consider non-human subjects and future generations, transcends traditional linguistic analysis.
Synergistic Interplay of Critical and Cognitive Approaches
Ecolinguistics synergistically combines Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Cognitive Linguistics.
CDA exposes power dynamics, biases, and hidden assumptions in environmental discourse, revealing how language reinforces dominant narratives.
Cognitive Linguistics, especially through "stories we live by," delves into the underlying mental models and cognitive structures that shape perception and behavior towards the environment.
This integrated approach allows ecolinguistics to achieve a profound level of analysis. It can deconstruct problematic environmental narratives through its critical lens and simultaneously understand the deeper cognitive roots that give rise to these narratives.
The core theoretical frameworks are summarized in the table below:
Framework | Key Theorist(s)/Origin | Core Concept | Methodological Tools | Contribution to Ecolinguistics |
"Stories We Live By" | Arran Stibbe | Cognitive structures/mental models that influence behavior and worldview. | Linguistic feature analysis, analysis of ideology, framing, metaphor, evaluation, identity, conviction, salience, erasure. | Reveals underlying drivers of human behavior and societal interaction with ecosystems. |
Eco-critical Discourse Analysis (ECDA) | M.A.K. Halliday, Michel Foucault | Language as social practice; discourse shapes and reinforces power relations, extended to human-ecological relationships. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), "description-explication-explanation" method. | Deconstructs harmful environmental narratives and prompts reflection on ecological crises. |
Metaphor and Framing Theory | George Lakoff, Mark Johnson | Conceptual mapping; how one area of life structures another; influence on information interpretation. | Analysis of trigger words, conceptual metaphor theory, conceptual blending theory. | Shapes perception, attitudes, and actions towards the environment. |
Cognitive Linguistics | George Lakoff, Mark Johnson, H. Maturana, F. Varela | Cognition as adaptive interaction with the environment; meaning as a link between mental representations and objects. | Biocognitive theory, conceptualization, categorization, analysis of mental representations. | Explains how humans construct meaning and adapt to their environment through language. |
Environmental Philosophy (Ecosophy/Deep Ecology) | Arne Naess | Intrinsic value of all life; eco-centrism over anthropocentrism; ethical framework for human-nature relations. | Normative framework for judging discourses; ethical evaluation of "stories we live by". | Provides the ethical foundation for judging whether linguistic practices protect or damage ecosystems. |